Saturday, April 1, 2017
Our Families Need Affordable Health Insurance
| Even those of us who have health insurance through our jobs are worried about how repeal of the ACA will affect our extended families. |
Dear Person
Who Opens the Mail,
Here’s
something you might not expect: If I had to pay for my own health insurance, I
would get $3,000 more under the AHCA than under the ACA.
But, I am
STILL against AHCA. Here’s why:
I have a daughter.
What if she starts a business after she’s 26? What if she becomes ill and
doesn’t have insurance through her employer?
I have a sister
who is barely making it. Her son has a life-threatening illness.
What will
happen to them if she loses her health insurance?
I have a mother.
What will happen to her when the ACHA cuts Medicaid?
Here is what
I want you to tell the Congressman: do not forget that we have families
and friends. That is why I call and write about AHCA. It’s not just
about me and what could happen if I lost health insurance. It’s about everyone.
That’s why
I’ve enclosed this papercut family. Americans are all connected, and we are all
going to do much better if we can minimize health catastrophes.
I urge the
Congressman to vote NO on the AHCA.
Sincerely,
Ellen Mackey
Paul Ryan, Health Care, and Lift-the-Flap Subtext
![]() |
| These are the top flaps of Congressman Ryan's health care plan. But, if you lift them, you will find out what he really means underneath. See next picture. |
Sorrow Eaters and American Health Care
| a Poem About People Who Feed on Sorrow |
Dear Person Who Opens the Mail,
I read a book last week,about a village
That had a day of sacrifice.
On that day, the youngest child
A baby was taken to the woods
And left there to appease a witch.
But there was really not a witch.
Only a woman in the village
Who needed sorrow.
A sorrow-eater.
She made up the story about the witch
To make people feel bereft and afraid
The better to feed her appetite.
Just a fantasy book, right?
No sorrow-eaters in America.
And yet, we must have sorrow
People who can’t pay for insurance must suffer
Personal responsibility, and corporate profits
And They Have to Learn Somehow, and all that.
But, would it be so bad if
We didn’t have to be thrown in a dark hole of fear?
Live one tragedy away from ruin?
Is there really a better way to spend our money?
Puppet Show: Is the US a Compassionate Nation?
Maybe You Need Some Better Magic
And, as far as I can tell, he hasn't really spoken up on the more egregious things Trump has done: his budget which makes deep cuts in vital programs so that he can give even more to the military, decimating the EPA, the travel bans, appointing alt-right leaders and corporate billionaires to positions of power, etc.
And, it took hi 4 months to have a face-to-face meeting with his constituents.
But, on the afternoon this photo was taken, he was perfectly happy to get some attention from a friendly crowd.
The magician called him up to be a part of her show. They cut the middle out of a handkerchief, and of course hers "healed" during the course of the act, and his was left with a gaping hole.
The symbolism of the thing struck me, though. Is he just a void at the center? Will he sell out his principles to get ahead with the new administration?
Here was my letter:
February 19, 2017
Dear Person Who Opens Mr. Coffman’s Mail,
In
case you didn’t hear about it, your boss tried to perform a little magic at the
Chinese New Year celebration last month.
It didn’t go so well.
Please tell him I sent him this magic wand so that he can
fix health care so that it can do all they’ve promised with the tax credits and
HAS contributions they’ve proposed.
Without an individual mandate, they’re going to need some
magic to keep premiums affordable.
And—they haven’t said a thing about trying to keep costs
down. Letting the government negotiate with pharmaceutical companies would be a
good start. They shouldn’t get to profit 20% while so many middle-income people
go without medicine. Shameful.
Most sincerely,
Ellen Mackey
| Mr. Coffman needed a better magic wand. So I sent him this one. |
New Health Care Bill Not Good for People of Modest Means
As I post this, the AHCA has gone down in a ball of flames. Not, as I had hoped, because it took money from the poor and gave it to the rich, It failed in the House because it didn't take enough money away from poor people.
I still believe the points I make in this letter are the things our country needs to think about in terms of health care.
PS: I got a form letter back saying that we need to repeal and replace ACA. Same old song and dance.
I still believe the points I make in this letter are the things our country needs to think about in terms of health care.
PS: I got a form letter back saying that we need to repeal and replace ACA. Same old song and dance.
Mr. Jeremy
Lippert
2443 Rayburn
House Office Building
Washington,
DC 20515
Dear Mr.
Lippert,
I have
looked at the better.gop site which proposes an ACA replacement, and I believe
it will be a worse deal for the struggling people of this country. I was referred
to that site by one of Rep. Coffman’s aides, so I have reason to believe it is
the one he supports.
**First, it
looks like you all will be relying on tax credits and HAS’s to do the bulk of
the work on trying to make health insurance affordable, those trusty old
standbys of Republican policy.
Those ideas
would probably work fine for me. My husband and I both work full time in
professional jobs and would be able to pay the premium, save money in an HAS
and wait for our tax credit.
It’s not
going to work at all for my sister who makes $40,000/year, is a single mom and
has two kids to take care of. The premiums for a family are around $18,000 this
year. I SERIOUSLY doubt that the tax credits are going to make that premium
affordable for her. Plus, she has to wait til tax time to get them. Do you
really think she can afford to do that? And really, how is she going to put
anything away in an HSA when she needs the money for—oh—things like food and
shelter?
It’s typical
of rich people like you (and me, truth be told) to think that tax credits and
shelters will solve the problem. They only work for people who have enough
money to wait for all those benefits.
**Second, I
find it disturbing that you don’t make any mention of bending down the cost
curve, except to say that you’ll let companies sell across state lines. There’s
not even any evidence that insurance companies want to do that. It takes a lot
of investment to develop deals with providers in other states, and they would
have to be sure of the market before they’ll take a risk like that. That’s a
weak piecemeal solution at best.
How about
allowing providers to negotiate lower prices with drug companies? Medicare is
prohibited from doing that. The pharmaceutical companies with their campaign
contributions have carved themselves out a nice little exception. They raise
prices 100, 200, and—not uncommonly—5,000 % because they can. Nice monopolies
they have going. They get their profit margins of 20% on all their medications
and Americans in particular suffer the consequences.
And, let’s
look at for-profit insurance companies. They spend 30% of their money on marketing
and underwriting NOT on helping their customers. Shameful.
And the
doctors and hospitals are not blameless, either. They are all making tons of
money off of us, which is why 1 out of
every 6 dollars in this country goes to health care. That’s ridiculous.
We have the
most costly and inefficient health care system among our peers, and often
terrible outcomes besides. I’m glad that people are marching in the streets
about it. They should have been way
before now.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


